HTP Graphics

IP Workbook

Issue link: https://htpgraphics.uberflip.com/i/116750

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 62 of 75

Emily's R&D SOLUTIONS Revenue Share Agreement Fixed royalty n It may be a risky ploy for Lakeland to go for a fixed royalty rate at this stage as it does not know what the Foreground IP might be. It may be more valuable. It could say the rate is to be agreed or if NWP and Lakeland cannot agree on independent expert will agree. Net sales n NWP has stated that the royalty will be a percentage of 'net sales'. It is important to know what this means. It often means the sales price after tax and other specified items have been deducted but you have to check the definition. Lakeland should ensure that it knows exactly what this means before it agrees to it. n NWP has specified that various costs will be deducted before the royalty is calculated. It is likely that NWP is seeking to deduct these as it has to pay for the costs associated with delivering products to its customers, insurance or other associated charges. Lakeland should remember that the more deductions it allows NWP to make, the less royalty it will receive. The deductible costs are very broad. Lakeland has no control over them. It should try to limit these deductions. Period n There is no reason why Lakeland's royalties should not continue for the period of the licence, which could be 20 years. It may be 10 years or so before a product gets to market. 61

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of HTP Graphics - IP Workbook